← Back to cherrypi.ioSample board, fictional project. Click around. Want this for your own project?Fictional scenario. Any resemblance to real organisations is illustrative.Talk to Gill →
CherryProject Intelligence

Nexus Bank — Core Banking Migration

AMBER — Regulatory deadline risk
ProAs at 27 Apr 2026
Executive snapshot · Amber

Behind baseline, but still recoverable if integration capacity is addressed now.

  • 1Integration build is 28 days behind, with 129 of 340 critical integrations unassigned.
  • 2Current critical-path forecast pushes go-live to Jun–Jul 2027, versus the approved Mar 2027 baseline.
  • 3The immediate decision is whether to approve $4–6M external integration capacity this week.
28d
Behind baseline
Integration build. 129 of 340 critical integrations have no developer.
Mar '27 → Jun/Jul '27
Go-live forecast
3–4 months late unless integration capacity is approved now.
36%
Complete
Plan was 49% by now, so the project is 13% behind.

Schedule outlook

Approved baseline
Mar 2027
Current forecast
Jun / Jul 2027
Variance
+3–4 months

Integration build delay is driving the variance. Recovery remains possible if additional capacity is approved now.

Critical pathZero or negative float from Discovery & Vendor Selection to Go-Live — Mar 2027

CBM.1Discovery & Vendor SelectionComplete
→
CBM.2.2Integration Build (340 tasks)0d · 28d behind
→
CBM.2.2.7APRA Regulatory Feeds0d · Unassigned
→
CBM.4.2System Integration Testing0d · Sep→Nov risk
→
CBM.4.3User Acceptance Testing0d · 6wk minimum
→
CBM.4.4Parallel Run — 3 months0d · APRA mandated
→
CBM.M1Go-Live — Mar 20270d · At risk

Every stage shown has zero or negative float, so delay passes straight through to the end date. Full detail on the Critical Path tab.

Delivery roadmapAs at 27 Apr 2026

Jan 2025 to Jun 2027 · Smartsheet exportCompleteOpenGo-live
Q1 2025
Q3 2025
Q1 2026
Q3 2026
Q1 2027
TODAY
APRA Notified

22 Jan 2025
Customer Comms Must Start

01 Jul 2026
APRA Deadline

01 Sep 2026
Go-Live Mar 2027

15 Mar 2027
P1
Discovery, Architecture & Vendor Selection
05 Jan 2025 to 30 Jun 2025 · 100% complete
100%
P2
Build, Configure & IntegrationAT RISK
01 Jul 2025 to 30 Sep 2026 · 44% complete
Integration build 28 days behind · 129 of 340 critical integrations unassigned
44%
P3
Customer Data Migration
01 Jul 2025 to 31 Mar 2027 · 25% complete
Duplicate account remediation 6 weeks behind
25%
P4
Testing & Parallel RunAT RISK
01 Sep 2026 to 31 Mar 2027 · 3% complete
SIT start date at risk from the integration build
3%
REG
Regulatory & Compliance — APRA CPS 234AT RISK
05 Jan 2025 to 30 Jun 2027 · 30% complete
Pre-cutover notification not lodged · due Sep 2026
30%
P5
Cutover & Hypercare
15 Mar 2027 to 30 Jun 2027 · 0% complete
0%

APRA CPS 234 notification required 6 months pre-cutover

Decisions required

Decision 1

Integration capacity shortfall threatens the Sep 2026 SIT start and Mar 2027 go-live

Requested: Approve engagement of an external integration specialist (Deloitte, Accenture, or a Temenos T24 specialist) to close the 129 unassigned integration tasks under a fixed-scope contract.

Recommended: Approve this week, before the September SIT start date becomes unrecoverable.

AuthorityBoard / Investment Committee
Needed byThis week

If not decided: Integration build completes Dec 2026 — 3 months past SIT start — putting the Mar 2027 go-live and APRA notification out of reach

Est. $4–6MLinked: Risk 2Linked: Recommended Action 1
Decision 2

Proactive APRA engagement strategy requires endorsement ahead of the CPS 234 deadline

Requested: Endorse proactively briefing APRA on the current delay and mitigation plan, rather than waiting for the formal September notification.

Recommended: Endorse early engagement this month — proactive disclosure preserves room to negotiate the notification timeline.

AuthorityCRO / Board Risk Committee
Needed byThis month

If not decided: Notification arrives without prior context, removing any opportunity to negotiate timeline flexibility and increasing enforcement exposure

Linked: Risk 1Linked: Recommended Action 2
Upcoming decisionRecovery vs rebaseline will be required after the integration-capacity decision.

What could change the outcome

The top risks that could move this outlook. A preview of the full Risk Analysis tab.

SeverityRisk
High risk
Integration capacity

129 critical integrations remain unassigned.

High risk
APRA notification

Current schedule compression threatens the Sep 2026 notification window.

Medium risk
Data migration

340K anomalies remain to be triaged.

View all 5 risks →

Workstream health

WorkstreamCompletePositionStatus
Integration Build38%28d behindAt risk
Data Migration25%6wk exposureWatch
Testing3%Sep start at riskAt risk
Regulatory30%Sep deadlineWatch
Data confidence: Medium · Refreshed 27 Apr 2026 · Dependency links unavailable
  • Dependency links aren't supplied — critical path is therefore directional, not calculated from formal schedule logic.
  • CBM.5.3 (CPS 234 milestone) has a 182-day duration configured, which looks unusual for a notification lodgement event.
  • The export gives System Integration Testing (CBM.4.2) four different finish dates: 31 Oct 2026 planned, Nov 2026 on the Schedule tab, Dec 2026 in that row's comment, and Feb 2027 on the Critical Path tab. Cherry reports them as found and has not chosen between them. Details on the Critical Path tab.
Delivery overview
  • 1Phase 1 is complete.
  • 2Phase 2 is understaffed on the integration build, the single largest driver of schedule exposure.
  • 3Phase 3 hasn't started substantively and depends entirely on integration recovery — the parallel run date is fixed by regulation, so upstream delay compresses the remaining phases rather than extending the project.
44%
Phase 2 complete
129
Integrations unassigned
340K
Data anomalies to triage
0%
Phase 3 not started

PhasesSelect a phase to expand

Current state assessment — 1,247 integrations catalogued100%
Lead: R. Singh · Jan 2025 → Apr 2025
Target architecture design100%
Lead: T. Rao · Mar 2025 → May 2025
Vendor selection — Temenos T24 contracted100%
Lead: PM · Apr 2025 → Jun 2025
All discovery complete. Temenos T24 selected and contracted. 1,247 integrations catalogued — 340 classified as critical path for cutover.
Core platform configuration (Temenos T24)72%
Lead: V. Chakraborty · Jul 2025 → Aug 2026
Integration build — 340 critical · 129 unassigned38%
Lead: V. Chakraborty · Jul 2025 → Sep 2026 — behind schedule
Integration build 28 days behind. 129 of 340 critical integrations have no assigned developer. 3 senior engineers resigned in Q1 — backfill ongoing. Integration completion is the critical path to UAT start.
Data quality audit — 2.1M records100%
Lead: A. Osei / Temenos · Sep 2025 → Dec 2025 — complete
Anomaly triage & remediation plan60%
Lead: A. Osei / Legal · Jan 2026 → May 2026 — tracking May 2026
Duplicate account remediation (180K accounts)20%
Lead: A. Osei / Branch Ops · Feb 2026 → Jul 2026 — tracking Sep 2026
340,000 anomalies identified — 180K duplicate/linked, 95K dormant, 65K outdated beneficiary data. Duplicate account remediation is 6 weeks behind and requires manual customer-linked review.
Test strategy, plan & environment setup40%
Lead: L. Ferreira · Mar 2026 → May 2026
System Integration Testing (SIT) — all 340 integrations0%
Lead: L. Ferreira · Sep 2026 → Oct 2026 — start date at risk
Parallel run — old and new systems simultaneously (3 months, non-negotiable)0%
Lead: All teams · Dec 2026 → Mar 2027
3-month parallel run is non-negotiable. Working backward: SIT Sep, UAT Oct–Nov, Parallel Run Dec–Mar, go-live Mar 2027 — at risk if the Phase 2 integration build slips further.
APRA initial project notification100%
Lead: M. Andersen · Jan 2025 → Jan 2025 — complete
Quarterly APRA progress reporting (ongoing)75%
Lead: M. Andersen · Apr 2025 → Mar 2027 · Q1 2026 lodged
CPS 234 pre-cutover notification — NOT LODGED0%
Lead: M. Andersen / Board · must lodge by Sep 2026
Pre-cutover notification NOT lodged. Sep 2026 deadline at risk from integration delays. Board members carry personal liability under APRA enforcement powers.
Cutover planning & weekend war room setup0%
Lead: S. Okafor / All leads · Jan 2027 → Feb 2027
Weekend cutover. 72-hour production window. All 2.1M customers. Rollback maintained 90 days. This is the only activity currently detailed under this phase — the rest of Cutover & Hypercare has not yet been broken down in the schedule.

ScheduleAs at 27 Apr 2026

Status
WBSTask%StartFinishForecastOwnerStatusComments
CBMNEXUS BANK — CORE BANKING MIGRATION36%05 Jan 202531 Mar 2027At riskS. OkaforIn Progress
AMBER overall. 28d behind baseline (integration build). APRA notification Sep 2026 at risk. 129 integrations unassigned after 3 resignations Q1. Parallel run non-negotiable 3 months pre-cutover.
CBM.1Phase 1 — Discovery, Architecture & Vendor Selection100%05 Jan 202530 Jun 202530 Jun 2025 ✓S. Okafor / DeloitteDone
All discovery complete on schedule. Temenos T24 selected. 1,247 integrations catalogued.
CBM.1.1Current state assessment — 1,247 integrations catalogued100%05 Jan 202531 Mar 202528 Mar 2025 ✓V. ChakrabortyDone
340 classified critical path. 50 classified decommission. 857 standard migration.
CBM.1.2Target architecture design — Temenos T24 on Azure100%01 Feb 202530 Apr 202502 May 2025 ✓Deloitte / V. ChakrabortyDone
Approved by architecture board. 2 days late due to security review — no impact.
CBM.1.3Vendor evaluation & Temenos T24 selection100%01 Mar 202530 Jun 202515 Jun 2025 ✓Procurement / BoardDone
Contract signed 15 Jun 2025. Deloitte Digital engaged as SI partner.
CBM.1.4APRA initial project notification (CPS 234)100%15 Jan 202522 Jan 202522 Jan 2025 ✓M. Andersen / K. BarrettDone
CPS 234 compliance assessment complete. Next touchpoint: pre-cutover notification, due Sep 2026.
CBM.2Phase 2 — Build, Configure & Integration44%01 Jul 202530 Sep 2026Tracking Dec 2026V. Chakraborty / DeloitteIn Progress
129 of 340 critical integrations unassigned. 3 senior engineers resigned Q1 — backfill 6–8 weeks to productivity.
CBM.2.1Temenos T24 core platform configuration72%01 Jul 202531 Jul 2026Tracking Aug 2026Temenos / DeloitteIn Progress
Deposits 90%, business banking 85%. Loans 60% — complex interest calcs causing delays.
CBM.2.1.1Retail banking product configuration100%01 Jul 202530 Sep 202530 Sep 2025 ✓Deloitte / TemenosDone
Transaction accounts, savings, term deposits — configured and unit tested.
CBM.2.1.2Business banking product configuration85%01 Oct 202515 Feb 2026Tracking Feb 2026Deloitte / TemenosIn Progress
Business accounts and overdrafts complete. Trade finance in final review.
CBM.2.1.3Loans & mortgage configuration — complex interest calcs60%01 Nov 202530 Apr 2026Tracking Jun 2026Deloitte / TemenosDelayed
Variable rate mortgage logic more complex than estimated. Escalated to Temenos HQ. 6-week delay expected.
CBM.2.2Integration build — 340 critical path integrations38%01 Jul 202530 Sep 2026Tracking Dec 2026V. Chakraborty + teamBehind — 28d
129 of 340 have NO assigned developer. 3 senior engineers (L. Obi, T. Ferreira, A. Park) resigned Q1. External specialist engagement recommended immediately.
CBM.2.2.1Core banking API layer — T24 REST APIs100%01 Jul 202531 Oct 202528 Oct 2025 ✓V. Chakraborty / L. Obi (resigned)Done
L. Obi resigned post-completion — knowledge transfer only partially done.
CBM.2.2.2Internet banking portal integration100%01 Oct 202515 Feb 202612 Feb 2026 ✓Digital teamDone
Performance tested to 50,000 concurrent users.
CBM.2.2.3Mobile banking app integration (iOS & Android)75%01 Feb 202630 Jun 2026Tracking Jul 2026Digital / T. Ferreira (resigned)In Progress
T. Ferreira was mobile lead — resigned 15 Mar. Handover incomplete. 3-week delay expected.
CBM.2.2.4Payment systems — NPP, BPAY, SWIFT, Direct Debit45%01 Mar 202631 Aug 2026Tracking Sep 2026V. ChakrabortyIn Progress
NPP complete. BPAY 60%. SWIFT 30% — complex correspondent banking. On critical path to SIT.
CBM.2.2.5Third-party integrations (129 of 340 UNASSIGNED)8%01 Sep 202530 Sep 2026Tracking Dec 2026VACANT (129 tasks)Understaffed
A. Park (resigned) owned these. Current velocity: complete Jan 2027. Needs 4–6 FTE external, ~$4–6M, board approval required.
CBM.2.2.6Branch & ATM network integration30%01 Apr 202631 Jul 2026Tracking on planBranch Ops / ITIn Progress
42 branches, 180 ATMs. Branch 40% on standard T24 teller interface. ATM 15% — Diebold Nixdorf.
CBM.2.2.7APRA regulatory reporting feeds0%01 Jun 202630 Sep 2026Unassigned — no resourceUNASSIGNEDNot Started
Mandatory — APRA requires uninterrupted reporting. Not ready before go-live is a regulatory breach. Escalate immediately.
CBM.3Phase 3 — Customer Data Migration (2.1M records)25%01 Jul 202531 Mar 2027Complex — 340K anomaliesA. Osei / TemenosIn Progress
340,000 anomalies requiring remediation before migration. Additional 6 weeks estimated.
CBM.3.1Data catalogue & schema mapping — legacy to T24100%01 Jul 202530 Sep 202525 Sep 2025 ✓A. Osei / TemenosDone
847 data entities mapped from legacy to T24 schema.
CBM.3.2Data quality audit — 2.1M records100%01 Sep 202515 Dec 202518 Dec 2025 ✓A. Osei / TemenosDone
340,000 anomalies — 180K duplicate/linked, 95K dormant, 65K outdated beneficiary data.
CBM.3.3Anomaly triage & remediation plan60%01 Jan 202615 May 2026Tracking May 2026A. Osei / LegalIn Progress
Dormant account strategy agreed with legal. Duplicate remediation complex — needs customer outreach.
CBM.3.4Duplicate account remediation (180K accounts)20%01 Feb 202631 Jul 2026Tracking Sep 2026A. Osei / Branch OpsIn Progress
Customer-linked duplicates require manual review. 6-week schedule risk to migration dry run.
CBM.3.5Migration dry run 1 — full data set0%01 Aug 202610 Aug 2026At risk — may slip SepA. Osei / TemenosNot Started
Requires all anomaly remediation complete. Slip risk if CBM.3.4 delayed.
CBM.3.6Migration dress rehearsal — simulated cutover0%01 Nov 202607 Nov 2026TBCA. Osei / All teamsNot Started
Full weekend cutover simulation. Target: complete in 62-hour window.
CBM.4Phase 4 — Testing & Parallel Run3%01 Sep 202631 Mar 2027At risk if CBM.2.2 slipsL. Ferreira / Business teamsPlanning
3-month parallel run non-negotiable. Working backward: SIT Sep, UAT Oct–Nov, Parallel Dec–Mar, Go-live Mar 2027.
CBM.4.1Test strategy, plan & environment setup40%01 Mar 202631 May 2026Tracking planL. FerreiraIn Progress
SIT environment being provisioned on Azure. Test data approach agreed.
CBM.4.2System Integration Testing (SIT) — all 340 integrations0%01 Sep 202631 Oct 2026At risk — Nov 2026L. Ferreira / V. ChakrabortyAt Risk
Cannot start until all 340 integrations complete. Current trajectory: Dec 2026 — 3 months after SIT target.
CBM.4.3User Acceptance Testing — business users0%01 Nov 202615 Dec 2026At riskBusiness teams / L. FerreiraNot Started
6-week minimum — cannot compress for a project of this complexity.
CBM.4.4Parallel run — old and new systems simultaneously (3 months)0%01 Dec 202628 Feb 2027At riskAll teams — major resource commitmentNot Started
NON-NEGOTIABLE — APRA and internal risk policy. Both systems run simultaneously for 3 months.
CBM.5Regulatory & Compliance — APRA CPS 23430%05 Jan 202530 Jun 2027APRA notification at riskM. Andersen / K. BarrettAPRA regulated
Pre-cutover notification NOT lodged. Sep 2026 deadline at risk. Board members carry personal liability.
CBM.5.1APRA initial notification — project commencement100%15 Jan 202522 Jan 202522 Jan 2025 ✓M. AndersenDone
APRA notified. CPS 234 compliance framework engaged. Quarterly reporting commenced.
CBM.5.2Quarterly APRA progress reporting (ongoing)75%01 Apr 202531 Mar 2027Q1 2026 lodged ✓M. AndersenOngoing
Q2 2026 report due Jul 2026. Reports have not disclosed integration delays — recommend disclosing proactively.
CBM.5.3CPS 234 pre-cutover notification — NOT LODGED — Sep 2026 deadline0%Must lodge: Sep 2026Sep 2026AT RISKM. Andersen / BoardNot Lodged
6-month minimum pre-notification for Mar 2027 go-live. BOARD: personal liability applies. Engage APRA proactively NOW.
CBM.5.4Proactive APRA delay briefing — RECOMMENDED IMMEDIATELY0%IMMEDIATEASAPNot scheduledM. Andersen / CEONot Done
APRA responds better to proactive disclosure. Brief APRA relationship manager. CEO and CRO to attend.
CBM.5.5Customer regulatory communications — 2.1M customers — NOT STARTED0%Should start: May 2026Jul 20267 weeks late to startK. Barrett / Comms teamNot Started
Comms plan requires 8 weeks. Must start by Jul 2026 for Dec parallel run comms. Comms team unaware this is assigned to them.
CBM.6Phase 5 — Cutover & Hypercare0%15 Mar 202730 Jun 2027—S. Okafor / All teamsNot Started
Weekend cutover. 72-hour production window. All 2.1M customers. Rollback maintained 90 days.
CBM.6.1Cutover planning & weekend war room setup0%01 Jan 202715 Feb 2027—S. Okafor / All leadsNot Started
Go/no-go criteria, rollback triggers, comms tree, war room roster, vendor on-call (Temenos, Deloitte).
CBM.M1◆ GO-LIVE — Core Banking Migration—15 Mar 202715 Mar 2027At risk — integration delaysAll teams / APRATarget
TARGET AT RISK. Integration delays + resignations + APRA notification risk + parallel run requirement = immediate intervention needed.

40 rows from the Nexus Bank demonstration schedule (Smartsheet export). Finish dates in red are past plan or forecast beyond plan.

0
Blocker
5
High
0
Medium
0
Resolved

Observed = read directly from the schedule export. Calculated = derived from export values. Modelled = a scenario, not a forecast. Recommended = Cherry's proposal.

1

APRA CPS 234 notification — Sep 2026 deadline at risk from integration delays

High · Regulatory

APRA's CPS 234 standard requires notification of material information asset changes well before implementation, and the current integration delay is compressing that runway.

For a March 2027 go-live, notification must be lodged by September 2026. The current 28-day integration delay means the project will not have sufficient testing confidence to lodge a credible notification in time, exposing Nexus Bank board members to personal liability under APRA enforcement powers.

APRA CPS 234·Board liability
2

129 critical integrations unassigned — 3 senior engineers departed Q1

High · Resource

Of 340 integrations on the critical path, a significant share have no developer assigned, and three senior integration engineers resigned in Q1 citing workload.

The backfill has produced 2 new hires currently onboarding, who will not be productive for 6–8 weeks. At current velocity the integration build will not complete until December 2026 — three months after the SIT start date — making UAT and parallel run impossible before March 2027.

Integration build·Critical path
3

3-month parallel run is non-negotiable — compresses every upstream phase

High · Schedule

APRA and Nexus Bank's own risk framework require a minimum parallel run of old and new systems before decommissioning the legacy platform, and that requirement is non-negotiable.

Working backward from the March 2027 go-live: parallel run must start by December 2026, UAT must be complete by November 2026, and SIT must start by September 2026. The current trajectory misses the September SIT start date by approximately 10 weeks.

Parallel run·Non-negotiable
4

Customer data migration — 2.1M records, data quality assessment revealed 340K anomalies

High · Data

The customer data migration audit identified data quality anomalies across duplicate accounts, outdated beneficiary details, and dormant accounts with unreconciled balances.

The migration team has a plan but it requires 6 additional weeks beyond the current timeline to resolve 340,000 anomalous records before cutover — migrating anomalous financial data into a new system during a cutover is not permissible.

2.1M customers·Migration
5

Customer communications plan not started — 2.1M customers need 8 weeks notice

High · Regulatory

The cutover will affect every Nexus Bank customer, and the customer communication plan covering downtime, branch hours, and dispute resolution has not been drafted.

Banking regulations require customers to be notified of material system changes. The communications team estimates 8 weeks to develop, approve, and deploy — this work needs to start by July 2026 to be ready for the December parallel run communications.

Customer comms·Not started

Regulatory deadline is fixed. All actions below are calibrated to protect the APRA notification date and March 2027 go-live. Actions 1 and 2 depend on an executive decision — see Decisions Required on the Executive Overview.

Observed = read directly from the schedule export. Calculated = derived from export values. Modelled = a scenario, not a forecast. Recommended = Cherry's proposal.

1

Engage external integration specialists immediately — close the 129-task gap within 60 days

This week

The integration build gap cannot be closed with internal hires alone in the available time.

Engage a specialist integration consultancy — Deloitte, Accenture, or a Temenos T24 specialist — under a fixed-scope contract to complete the 129 unassigned integrations. This will cost approximately $4–6M but protects a $340M project and avoids regulatory breach. Owner proceeds on approval of Decision 1.

Board approval·Integration
Pending decision 1
2

Engage APRA proactively — inform them of the delay and your mitigation plan now

This month

Do not wait until September to surface the timeline risk with APRA.

Engage the APRA relationship manager this month with a transparent briefing on the current position, the cause of the delay, and the specific mitigation actions underway. Early engagement may create space to negotiate the notification timeline if mitigation is demonstrably underway. Owner proceeds on endorsement of Decision 2.

APRA·Proactive
Pending decision 2
3

Start customer communications planning now — do not wait for UAT

This week

The comms team needs 8 weeks, and that clock has not started.

July 2026 is the latest start — 10 weeks from today. Brief the communications lead this week on the cutover timeline, parallel run window, and customer impact scope. Regulatory comms require legal review, ASIC alignment, and executive approval, all of which take time that doesn't exist if you start in July.

Customer comms·2.1M customers
4

Triage the 340K data anomalies — classify and scope the remediation this week

This week

Not all anomalies carry equal risk, and right now they're being treated as one undifferentiated problem.

Triage the 340,000 flagged records by category and impact: dormant accounts with zero balance can be handled post-migration, duplicate accounts with active transactions cannot. A triage classification this week converts an unknown into a quantified risk with a concrete plan.

Data migration·Triage
5

Address engineer retention — exit interview findings must be acted on now

This month

Three senior engineers left in Q1, and the exit interviews almost certainly identified root causes — workload, management, compensation, or culture.

Act on those findings publicly and demonstrably this month. Losing two more senior integration engineers in the next 6 months would make the March 2027 go-live effectively impossible. Retention is cheaper than replacement at this stage of a project.

Retention·Engineering team

Integration Build — 340 Critical IntegrationsLead: V. Chakraborty · Partner: Temenos · 3 vacancies · 129 unassigned

38%
28d behind · understaffed
129 of 340 critical integrations have no assigned developer. At current velocity: completion Dec 2026 — 3 months after SIT must start.
Status
TaskStartFinishOwner%Status
Core banking API layer (T24)Jul 2025Oct 2025V. Chakraborty100%Done
Internet banking portalOct 2025Feb 2026Digital team100%Done
Mobile banking app integrationFeb 2026Jun 2026Digital team75%In progress
Payment systems (NPP, BPAY, SWIFT)Mar 2026Aug 2026V. Chakraborty45%In progress
Third-party integrations (129 unassigned)OngoingSep 2026VACANT8%Understaffed
Branch & ATM networkApr 2026Jul 2026Ops team30%In progress
Regulatory reporting feeds (APRA)Jun 2026Sep 2026V. Chakraborty0%Not started
Linked risks
Risk 2
129 critical integrations unassigned — 3 senior engineers departed Q1
At current velocity the integration build completes Dec 2026 — 3 months after SIT must start. Makes March 2027 go-live unachievable.
Risk 3
3-month parallel run is non-negotiable — compresses all upstream phases
Working backward: parallel run Dec 2026, UAT Nov 2026, SIT Sep 2026. Integration delays already miss the Sep start by 10 weeks.
Linked actions
Action 1This weekBoard approval
Engage external integration specialists immediately
Engage Deloitte, Accenture, or a Temenos T24 specialist to close the 129-task gap within 60 days. ~$4–6M cost protects a $340M project.
Action 5This month
Address engineer retention — act on exit interview findings now
Three senior engineers left in Q1. Losing more makes the go-live impossible. Retention is cheaper than replacement at this stage.

Customer Data Migration — 2.1M RecordsLead: A. Osei · Data Quality: 340K anomalies identified · Migration partner: Temenos

25%
anomalies being resolved
Status
TaskStartFinishOwner%Status
Data catalogue & schema mappingJul 2025Sep 2025A. Osei100%Done
Data quality audit — 2.1M recordsSep 2025Dec 2025Temenos100%Done — 340K issues
Anomaly triage & classificationJan 2026May 2026A. Osei60%In progress
Duplicate account remediationFeb 2026Jul 2026A. Osei20%Complex
Migration dry run 1Aug 2026Aug 2026Temenos0%Not started
Migration dress rehearsalNov 2026Nov 2026A. Osei0%Not started
◆ Production migration — cutover weekendMar 2027Mar 2027All teams0%Go-live
Linked risks
Risk 4
340K data anomalies — remediation adds 6 weeks to migration timeline
Duplicate accounts with active transactions must be resolved before cutover. Migration of anomalous financial data during a cutover is not permissible.
Linked actions
Action 4This weekData migration
Triage the 340K data anomalies this week
Classify by type and impact — dormant zero-balance accounts can be handled post-migration. Quantify what truly blocks cutover vs. what can run in parallel.

Testing & Parallel RunTest Manager: L. Ferreira · SIT · UAT · 3-month parallel run required

3%
planning only
SIT must start Sep 2026. Integration build delays mean this date is at risk. 3-month parallel run is non-negotiable — it sets all upstream deadlines.
Status
TaskStartFinishOwner%Status
Test strategy & planMar 2026May 2026L. Ferreira40%In progress
SIT environment setupJun 2026Aug 2026IT team5%Early stage
System Integration Testing (SIT)Sep 2026Oct 2026L. Ferreira0%At risk
User Acceptance Testing (UAT)Oct 2026Nov 2026Business teams0%Not started
Parallel run — both systems runningDec 2026Mar 2027All teams0%3 months req.
◆ Go-live — cutover weekendMar 2027Mar 2027Project0%Target
Linked risks
Risk 3
3-month parallel run is non-negotiable — sets all upstream dates
Working backward: parallel run must start Dec 2026, UAT complete Nov 2026, SIT start Sep 2026. Integration delays already miss Sep start by 10 weeks.
Linked actions
Action 3This week2.1M customers
Start customer communications planning now — do not wait for UAT
The comms team needs 8 weeks. July 2026 is the latest start — 10 weeks from today. Regulatory comms require legal review, ASIC alignment, and executive approval.

Regulatory & ComplianceCRO: M. Andersen · APRA relationship · Legal: K. Barrett · Board accountability

AT RISK
APRA deadline at risk
APRA CPS 234 notification must be lodged by September 2026. Integration delays put this at risk. Board members carry personal liability for regulatory breach.
Status
TaskStartFinishOwner%Status
APRA initial project notificationJan 2025Jan 2025M. Andersen100%Done
CPS 234 compliance assessmentApr 2025Jun 2025K. Barrett100%Done
Quarterly APRA progress reportingJan 2025OngoingM. Andersen75%Ongoing
CPS 234 pre-cutover notificationAug 2026Sep 2026M. Andersen0%At risk
Proactive APRA delay briefingNOWThis monthM. Andersen0%Not done
Customer regulatory communicationsJul 2026Mar 2027K. Barrett0%Not started
Post go-live APRA reportMar 2027Jun 2027M. Andersen0%Not started
Linked risks
Risk 1
APRA CPS 234 notification — Sep 2026 deadline at risk from integration delays
Failure to notify APRA appropriately exposes Nexus Bank board members to personal liability under APRA enforcement powers.
Linked actions
Action 2This monthRegulatory
Engage APRA proactively — inform them of the delay now
Do not wait until September. APRA responds far better to proactive disclosure. Early engagement may create space to negotiate the notification timeline.

Critical pathFrom the schedule export

The critical path runs unbroken through Integration Build → APRA Regulatory Feeds → SIT → UAT → Parallel Run → Go-Live. Every stage carries zero total float. The integration build is already 28 days behind with 129 tasks unassigned — meaning the critical path is actively degrading. Every day without external resourcing is a day added to the Mar 2027 go-live date, with no mechanism for recovery downstream.

18
Critical activities · 0d float
28d+
Days at risk
9
Near-critical ≤10d
547d
Longest path span

Sequence: 7 stages, read left to right and top to bottom. Critical activities are counted separately, as the longest path covers more tasks than the stages shown.

Critical path sequence

1CBM.1Discovery & Vendor SelectionComplete
→
2CBM.2.2Integration Build (340 tasks)0d · 28d behind
→
3CBM.2.2.7APRA Regulatory Feeds0d · Unassigned
→
4CBM.4.2System Integration Testing0d · Sep→Nov risk
→
5CBM.4.3User Acceptance Testing0d · 6wk minimum
→
6CBM.4.4Parallel Run — 3 months0d · APRA mandated
→
7CBM.M1Go-Live — Mar 20270d · At risk

Where the schedule disagrees with itselfObserved in the export, not resolved

System Integration Testing (CBM.4.2) is shown with four different finish dates. The export does not say which one governs, and without dependency links Cherry cannot calculate it.

Where it appearsFinish date shownWhat it says
Schedule tab, planned finish31 Oct 2026The baseline date.
Schedule tab, forecast columnNov 2026"At risk — Nov 2026".
Schedule tab, row commentDec 2026"Current trajectory: Dec 2026 — 3 months after SIT target."
Critical Path tab, forecastFeb 2027Forecast against the same planned finish of 31 Oct 2026.

Observed in the export, not resolved. The decision card's "Dec 2026" is the integration build completing, not a SIT date. Worth confirming with the Test Manager which SIT date the project is working to; every date after SIT (UAT, parallel run, go-live) moves with it.

Critical task detail

WBSTaskDurationPlanned finishForecastOwner
CBM.2.2Integration build — 340 critical integrations336d30 Sep 2026Dec 2026V. Chakraborty
CBM.2.2.5Third-party integrations — 129 of 340 UNASSIGNED Alert280d30 Sep 2026Jan 2027VACANT
CBM.2.2.4Payment systems — NPP, BPAY, SWIFT, Direct Debit168d31 Aug 2026Sep 2026V. Chakraborty
CBM.2.2.7APRA regulatory reporting feeds — NOT STARTED, NO OWNER Alert63d30 Sep 2026UnknownUNASSIGNED
CBM.4.2System Integration Testing — all 340 integrations42d31 Oct 2026Feb 2027L. Ferreira
CBM.4.3User Acceptance Testing — all business units (6wk minimum)42d15 Dec 2026Mar 2027Business teams
CBM.4.4Parallel run — old + new systems (APRA mandated, non-negotiable)84d28 Feb 2027May 2027All teams
REG-003CPS 234 pre-cutover APRA notification — NOT LODGED Alert182dSep 2026AT RISKM. Andersen / Board
CBM.M1◆ GO-LIVE — Core Banking Migration—15 Mar 2027Jun–Jul 2027S. Okafor / All

Showing 9 of the 18 critical activities.

Near-critical tasks

CBM-023
Mobile banking app — iOS & Android~3 weeks float

T. Ferreira resigned — handover incomplete. iOS 75%, Android 60%. New dev onboarding adds further delay risk.

CBM-013
Loans & mortgage config — complex interest calcs~6 weeks float (shrinking)

6-week delay from Temenos HQ escalation. Float consumed — near-critical for SIT data completeness.

CBM.3.4
Duplicate account remediation (180K accounts)~6 weeks float

20% complete. Manual process slower than automated. 6-week risk to Aug 2026 dry run, which precedes SIT.

REG-005
Customer communications — 2.1M customers7 weeks late to start

8-week plan + legal/ASIC approval required. Not started. Comms team not yet briefed.

CBM.3.5
Migration dry run 1 — full data setSlip risk to Sep 2026

Requires all anomaly remediation complete. Sep slip collides with SIT start — no buffer.

CBM.5.2
APRA Q2 2026 quarterly report — delay disclosureDue Jul 2026

Integration delays not yet disclosed. Proactive disclosure in Q2 report reduces enforcement risk.

Float distribution

0d (critical)18 tasks
1–10d9 tasks
11–30d11 tasks
> 30d6 tasks

Nexus Bank is a fictional organisation and project, built to show how Cherry reads a project schedule export. It does not describe a real bank, and no real project team has used or endorsed Cherry for it.

Talk to Gill →